KU. PAYAL SONI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2129/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010084102026

Filing Number

MCRC/3590/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2129/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KU. PAYAL SONI

    Adv. ARUN KUMAR KOCHAR,RENU KOCHAR ( WITH NOC),RENU KOCHAR ( WITH NOC), ,LEEKESH KUMAR,AVISHEK BHARTI,RAHIL ARUN KOCHAR,GYAN PRAKASH DANDEKAR,RENU KOCHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Ku. Payal Soni's bail application in a cyber fraud case involving 22 bank accounts used as "mule accounts" to launder ₹10,67,665 from cyber crimes. Although the applicant claimed false implication and no criminal record, the court found that ₹71,06,579 was credited to her account within months of opening it in 2023, with nearly equal amounts debited by accused persons, establishing her involvement warranting continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Additional Registrar(j)

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2129/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Ku. Payal Soni's bail application in a cyber fraud case involving 22 bank accounts used as "mule accounts" to launder ₹10,67,665 from cyber crimes. Although the applicant claimed false implication and no criminal record, the court found that ₹71,06,579 was credited to her account within months of opening it in 2023, with nearly equal amounts debited by accused persons, establishing her involvement warranting continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case