MADAN PRASAD SINHA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/1249/2022

Disposed: Contested--NON PROSECUTION on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010084072022

Filing Number

WPC/4592/2022

Filing Date

07-Mar-2022

Registration No

WPC/1249/2022

Registration Date

09-Mar-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--NON PROSECUTION

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MADAN PRASAD SINHA

    Adv. Curtis Collins,SUNIL KUMAR SONI,SUNIL KUMAR SONI, ,SUNIL KUMAR SONI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Collector,

  3. 3.Sub Divisional Officer,

  4. 4.Tehsildar,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: WPC/1249/2022 Madan Prasad Sinha's writ petition against the State of Chhattisgarh and district officials was dismissed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh on May 8, 2026. The petitioner's counsel informed the court that he had no instructions from the petitioner to proceed with the matter, resulting in dismissal for want of instructions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

  4. 11-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

  5. 10-Mar-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh SamantView PDF

  6. 10-Mar-2022

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant

  7. 07-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/1249/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPC/1249/2022 Madan Prasad Sinha's writ petition against the State of Chhattisgarh and district officials was dismissed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh on May 8, 2026. The petitioner's counsel informed the court that he had no instructions from the petitioner to proceed with the matter, resulting in dismissal for want of instructions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case