PILARAM VERMA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/2027/2022
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010083162022
Filing Number
WPS/4544/2022
Filing Date
07-Mar-2022
Registration No
WPS/2027/2022
Registration Date
24-Mar-2022
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PILARAM VERMA
Adv. MANOJ KUMAR SINHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Divisional Forest Officer,
-
3.The Divisional Joint Director,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
Case Summary: WPS 2027/2022 - Pilaram Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh The court ordered respondents to release revised pension under the 7th Pay Commission and other dues to retired forest guard Pilaram Verma from the applicable date. The court found that creating separate pension entitlement dates for pre-2006 and pre-2016 retirees violated Article 14 (equality) as all pensioners form a single class unaffected by retirement timing. Both Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh must bear their respective shares within 120 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
17-Jun-2022
Motion Hearing Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
-
18-Apr-2022
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
-
29-Mar-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam KoshyView PDF
-
29-Mar-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2022
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/2027/2022
Case Summary: WPS 2027/2022 - Pilaram Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh The court ordered respondents to release revised pension under the 7th Pay Commission and other dues to retired forest guard Pilaram Verma from the applicable date. The court found that creating separate pension entitlement dates for pre-2006 and pre-2016 retirees violated Article 14 (equality) as all pensioners form a single class unaffected by retirement timing. Both Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh must bear their respective shares within 120 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts