HARSHIT SAXENA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2077/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010083122026
Filing Number
MCRC/3560/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
MCRC/2077/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
NDPS Act ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 26-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARSHIT SAXENA
Adv. Lukesh Kumar Mishra,MANOJ KUMAR YADAV,MANOJ KUMAR YADAV, ,Vinay Nagdev,AKASH MISHRA,MANOJ KUMAR YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
Case Summary: Harshit Saxena v. State of Chhattisgarh (MCRC 2077/2026) The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to 23-year-old Harshit Saxena, arrested for NDPS Act violations after 10.45 kg of cannabis was seized from his joint possession with co-accused. The court found that the seized quantity was below the commercial threshold (20 kg), the charge-sheet had been filed, and the applicant had no criminal record and had already spent considerable jail time since January 5, 2026. Bail was granted subject to stringent conditions including a personal bond with two sureties, mandatory court attendance, and restrictions on seeking adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
02-Mar-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
02-Mar-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/2077/2026
Case Summary: Harshit Saxena v. State of Chhattisgarh (MCRC 2077/2026) The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to 23-year-old Harshit Saxena, arrested for NDPS Act violations after 10.45 kg of cannabis was seized from his joint possession with co-accused. The court found that the seized quantity was below the commercial threshold (20 kg), the charge-sheet had been filed, and the applicant had no criminal record and had already spent considerable jail time since January 5, 2026. Bail was granted subject to stringent conditions including a personal bond with two sureties, mandatory court attendance, and restrictions on seeking adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts