DILIP DAS vs BASANT KUMARI GUPTA Advocate - CHANDRESH SHRIVASTAVA, ,Anmol Sharma,RAKSHITA MISHRA,RAKSHITA MISHRA,Anmol Sharma,Anmol Sharma,RAKSHITA MISHRA — FA/56/2025

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010082652025

Filing Number

FA/4672/2025

Filing Date

25-Feb-2025

Registration No

FA/56/2025

Registration Date

07-Mar-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION ( 1716 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DILIP DAS

    Adv. P R PATANKAR,VARTIKA SHRIVASTAVA,VARTIKA SHRIVASTAVA, ,PRAJAKTA PATANKAR,PRAVESH SAHU,MAYANK MULCHANDANI,MAYANK MULCHANDANI

  2. 2.Smt. Dashreet Das

  3. 3.Santu

  4. 4.Bishal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BASANT KUMARI GUPTA Advocate - CHANDRESH SHRIVASTAVA, ,Anmol Sharma,RAKSHITA MISHRA,RAKSHITA MISHRA,Anmol Sharma,Anmol Sharma,RAKSHITA MISHRA

  2. 2.Yogeshwar Sonkar

    Adv. CHANDRESH SHRIVASTAVA,Anmol Sharma SASHWAT GUPTA AMANDEEP SINGH RAKSHITA MISHRA SAURABH MAHANT

  3. 3.Smt. Pushpa Sonkar

  4. 4.Prahlad

  5. 5.State of Chhattisgarh

    Adv. A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' appeal seeking title declaration based on adverse possession of agricultural land. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish the essential ingredients of adverse possession—specifically, the date of possession, nature of possession, and knowledge of the true owner—through both documentary and oral evidence. Since all documentary records showed the defendant as the title and possession holder, and the plaintiffs' witnesses provided vague and contradictory testimony, the court affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

  4. 19-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  5. 11-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  6. 11-Mar-2025

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

  7. 25-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA/56/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' appeal seeking title declaration based on adverse possession of agricultural land. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to establish the essential ingredients of adverse possession—specifically, the date of possession, nature of possession, and knowledge of the true owner—through both documentary and oral evidence. Since all documentary records showed the defendant as the title and possession holder, and the plaintiffs' witnesses provided vague and contradictory testimony, the court affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case