MADHU SARAF vs ANAND SARAF Advocate - A.G. — WP227/270/2020

Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010082322020

Filing Number

WP227/4618/2020

Filing Date

04-Mar-2020

Registration No

WP227/270/2020

Registration Date

05-Mar-2020

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MADHU SARAF

    Adv. Palash Tiwari,PRAKASH TIWARI,PRAKASH TIWARI, ,PRAKASH TIWARI

  2. 2.Manju

  3. 3.Arti

  4. 4.Anju

  5. 5.Mamta

  6. 6.Anuradha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANAND SARAF Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Nitesh Sharma

  3. 3.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

    Adv. A.G.

  4. 4.Shiv Sharma

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed on 07/05/2026. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the underlying civil suit, which was the subject of the challenged order, had already been decided by the trial court, rendering the writ petition infructuous. Consequently, the petitioners chose not to pursue the petition further, and the court accepted this position and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2020

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant

  4. 16-Mar-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh SamantView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Mar-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP227/270/2020

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed on 07/05/2026. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the underlying civil suit, which was the subject of the challenged order, had already been decided by the trial court, rendering the writ petition infructuous. Consequently, the petitioners chose not to pursue the petition further, and the court accepted this position and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case