CHANDRAKALA CHITRANJAY PATEL, ,PRASHANT DANSENA vs SHOBHARAM RATRE — CRMP/756/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010082092026

Filing Number

CRMP/3502/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRMP/756/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO RESTORATION / MODIFICATION / EXTENSION OF TIME IN DECIDED CRIMINAL CASE ( 1450 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDRAKALA CHITRANJAY PATEL, ,PRASHANT DANSENA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHOBHARAM RATRE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted the petitioner's application for extension of time to file an appeal under Section 528 BNSS. The court allowed the extension considering the petitioner's advanced age (75 years), widow status, and serious health issues that prevented timely filing. The appeal was permitted to be filed by the extended deadline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/756/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted the petitioner's application for extension of time to file an appeal under Section 528 BNSS. The court allowed the extension considering the petitioner's advanced age (75 years), widow status, and serious health issues that prevented timely filing. The appeal was permitted to be filed by the extended deadline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case