RAJNISH PANDEY @ ANKU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2038/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010082052026

Filing Number

MCRC/3501/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2038/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

NDPS Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJNISH PANDEY @ ANKU

    Adv. Lukesh Kumar Mishra,MANOJ KUMAR YADAV,MANOJ KUMAR YADAV, ,Vinay Nagdev,GIRISH SAHU,AKASH MISHRA,MANOJ KUMAR YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/2038/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Rajnish Pandey, arrested for possessing 192 Proxyco Spas capsules (139 mg) under NDPS Act sections 22C(8) and 27(A). The court found the quantity was below commercial threshold, prior criminal antecedents were non-NDPS related and stale, and the chargesheet was already filed with trial expected to take considerable time. Conditions: Release on personal bond with two sureties, mandatory court attendance on all trial dates, no adjournment requests when witnesses present, and strict compliance with trial procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2038/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/2038/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Rajnish Pandey, arrested for possessing 192 Proxyco Spas capsules (139 mg) under NDPS Act sections 22C(8) and 27(A). The court found the quantity was below commercial threshold, prior criminal antecedents were non-NDPS related and stale, and the chargesheet was already filed with trial expected to take considerable time. Conditions: Release on personal bond with two sureties, mandatory court attendance on all trial dates, no adjournment requests when witnesses present, and strict compliance with trial procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case