GIRJA NISHAD vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2132/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010080462026

Filing Number

MCRC/3452/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2132/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GIRJA NISHAD

    Adv. shobhit koshta,RAJENDRA KUMAR,RAJENDRA KUMAR, ,RAJENDRA KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the bail application of Girja Nishad, accused of abetting rape of a minor under POCSO Act, finding she was not the main accused and considering the trial's lengthy duration with only 7 of 18 witnesses examined. The court released her on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of equal amount, noting her incarceration since January 30, 2025, and the victim's unavailability as trial witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Final Disposal/Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2132/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the bail application of Girja Nishad, accused of abetting rape of a minor under POCSO Act, finding she was not the main accused and considering the trial's lengthy duration with only 7 of 18 witnesses examined. The court released her on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of equal amount, noting her incarceration since January 30, 2025, and the victim's unavailability as trial witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case