R.K.GAUTAM vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/1935/2021

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010080312021

Filing Number

WPS/4676/2021

Filing Date

09-Mar-2021

Registration No

WPS/1935/2021

Registration Date

16-Mar-2021

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R.K.GAUTAM

    Adv. MANOJ KUMAR SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Collector

  3. 3.The District Ayurved Officer

  4. 4.The District Treasury Officer

  5. 5.The Commissioner Income Tax Department

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed WPS No. 1935 of 2021 filed by retired Unani Medical Officer R.K. Gautam against the State of Chhattisgarh and other authorities. The court found the petition infructuous due to efflux of time and dismissed it based on the petitioner's counsel's own submission that the matter had become moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Jul-2021

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy

  4. 08-Jun-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam KoshyView PDF

  5. 08-Jun-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/1935/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed WPS No. 1935 of 2021 filed by retired Unani Medical Officer R.K. Gautam against the State of Chhattisgarh and other authorities. The court found the petition infructuous due to efflux of time and dismissed it based on the petitioner's counsel's own submission that the matter had become moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case