DONTAMALA KISHORE KUMAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2110/2026
Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010079992026
Filing Number
MCRC/3417/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
MCRC/2110/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 26-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DONTAMALA KISHORE KUMAR
Adv. SMITA JHA,RISHI KUMAR JHA,RISHI KUMAR JHA, ,Navin Shukla,Navin Shukla
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
Case Summary: MCRC 2110/2026 Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Dontamala Kishore Kumar's bail application in a cyber fraud case. The court found substantial evidence that Kumar knowingly provided his bank account to facilitate online fraud schemes, receiving ₹6.10 lakhs in fraudulently obtained money linked to multiple complaints across multiple states. Key Reasoning: Despite Kumar's claim that his account was hacked, the investigating officer's affidavit revealed Kumar admitted colluding with co-accused persons and explicitly acknowledged providing his bank account for fraudulent activities. Multiple cyber fraud complaints registered nationally against his account, combined with his own admission of involvement, established his participation in an organized cyber fraud gang. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/2110/2026
Case Summary: MCRC 2110/2026 Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Dontamala Kishore Kumar's bail application in a cyber fraud case. The court found substantial evidence that Kumar knowingly provided his bank account to facilitate online fraud schemes, receiving ₹6.10 lakhs in fraudulently obtained money linked to multiple complaints across multiple states. Key Reasoning: Despite Kumar's claim that his account was hacked, the investigating officer's affidavit revealed Kumar admitted colluding with co-accused persons and explicitly acknowledged providing his bank account for fraudulent activities. Multiple cyber fraud complaints registered nationally against his account, combined with his own admission of involvement, established his participation in an organized cyber fraud gang. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts