MOHAMMED JAVED @ AMIT vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2180/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010079892026

Filing Number

MCRC/3408/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2180/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

NDPS Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMED JAVED @ AMIT

    Adv. B.P.SINGH,HARSVARDHAN SINGH THAKUR,HARSVARDHAN SINGH THAKUR, ,VIDYA BHUSHAN SONI,ADITYA SRIVASTAV,ROSHAN SINGH LAMBA,Sudhanshu Kumar Singh,Sudhanshu Kumar Singh

  2. 2.Mahadev Sahu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/2180/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Mohammed Javed @ Amit and Mahadev Sahu in an NDPS case involving illegal possession and sale of narcotic medicines. The court found that despite the serious charges under Sections 21(B) and 27(A) of the NDPS Act, 1985, the applicants' prolonged detention since December 2025, clean criminal records, intermediate quantity of contraband, and completed investigation warranted bail, subject to strict conditions including personal bonds with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2180/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/2180/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Mohammed Javed @ Amit and Mahadev Sahu in an NDPS case involving illegal possession and sale of narcotic medicines. The court found that despite the serious charges under Sections 21(B) and 27(A) of the NDPS Act, 1985, the applicants' prolonged detention since December 2025, clean criminal records, intermediate quantity of contraband, and completed investigation warranted bail, subject to strict conditions including personal bonds with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case