DHANANJAY NAG vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2112/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010078982026

Filing Number

MCRC/3363/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2112/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

NDPS Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHANANJAY NAG

    Adv. DHIRENDRA PRASAD MISHRA,MANOJ KUMAR YADAV,MANOJ KUMAR YADAV, ,AKANKSHA MISHRA,MANOJ KUMAR YADAV

  2. 2.Deepak Mahanand

  3. 3.Shankar Harpal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/2112/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of three accused (Dhananjay Nag, Deepak Mahanand, and Shankar Harpal) arrested for transporting 25 kilograms of ganja from Odisha to Chhattisgarh in violation of the NDPS Act. Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha held that the quantity of contraband seized exceeded commercial quantity, and considering the gravity of the offense and statutory restrictions under NDPS, bail could not be granted despite arguments about prolonged detention and hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2112/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/2112/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of three accused (Dhananjay Nag, Deepak Mahanand, and Shankar Harpal) arrested for transporting 25 kilograms of ganja from Odisha to Chhattisgarh in violation of the NDPS Act. Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha held that the quantity of contraband seized exceeded commercial quantity, and considering the gravity of the offense and statutory restrictions under NDPS, bail could not be granted despite arguments about prolonged detention and hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case