DAVID KHARE ALIAS ALU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2312/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010078762026

Filing Number

MCRC/3354/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2312/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DAVID KHARE ALIAS ALU

    Adv. Vikram Sharma,SANDIP KUMAR PANDEY,SANDIP KUMAR PANDEY, ,ABHINAV SHARMA,SANDIP KUMAR PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to David Khare (19), accused of abducting and sexually abusing a minor girl, on the basis that the victim's court statement contradicted the prosecution's allegations, the medical evidence was inconclusive, and the trial would take considerable time with only 4 of 19 witnesses examined. The victim and her father expressed no objection to bail. The applicant was released on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2312/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to David Khare (19), accused of abducting and sexually abusing a minor girl, on the basis that the victim's court statement contradicted the prosecution's allegations, the medical evidence was inconclusive, and the trial would take considerable time with only 4 of 19 witnesses examined. The victim and her father expressed no objection to bail. The applicant was released on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case