SAHIL MASIH vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2124/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010077442026

Filing Number

MCRC/3295/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2124/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

NDPS Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAHIL MASIH

    Adv. AJAY KUMAR CHANDRA,PARAS RAM SAHU,PARAS RAM SAHU, ,PARAS RAM SAHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Sahil Masih, a 21-year-old arrested with 9kg of ganja under NDPS Act Section 20(B). The court found that since the seizure quantity was below the commercial threshold, the applicant had no prior criminal record, and prolonged trial was anticipated, he merited release on personal bond with two sureties and strict conditions including mandatory court attendance and no adjournment-seeking during evidence proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2124/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Sahil Masih, a 21-year-old arrested with 9kg of ganja under NDPS Act Section 20(B). The court found that since the seizure quantity was below the commercial threshold, the applicant had no prior criminal record, and prolonged trial was anticipated, he merited release on personal bond with two sureties and strict conditions including mandatory court attendance and no adjournment-seeking during evidence proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case