REYAZUDDIN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/1961/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010077302026
Filing Number
MCRC/3288/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
MCRC/1961/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
POCSO Act ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.REYAZUDDIN
Adv. Pushkar Sinha,SHASHIKESH YADAV,SHASHIKESH YADAV, ,PAWAN SHRIVASTAVA,Abhishek Choubey,Abhishek Choubey
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Reyazuddin, arrested for alleged abduction and sexual abuse of a minor under BNS 2023 and POCSO Act. The court found it appropriate to release him on bail considering he had been incarcerated since February 2025, only 2 of 12 witnesses had been examined, the trial would take considerable time, and the victim had again gone missing without informing her family. He was directed to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Final Disposal/Final Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
-
13-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
-
26-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/1961/2026
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Reyazuddin, arrested for alleged abduction and sexual abuse of a minor under BNS 2023 and POCSO Act. The court found it appropriate to release him on bail considering he had been incarcerated since February 2025, only 2 of 12 witnesses had been examined, the trial would take considerable time, and the victim had again gone missing without informing her family. He was directed to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts