DR. PREMLAL RATRE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/1485/2025
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010076822025
Filing Number
WPS/4350/2025
Filing Date
20-Feb-2025
Registration No
WPS/1485/2025
Registration Date
24-Feb-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DR. PREMLAL RATRE
Adv. AKASH PANDEY,HARSHAL CHOUHAN,HARSHAL CHOUHAN, ,MAYANK CHANDRAKAR,KESHAV DEWANGAN,HARSHAL CHOUHAN
-
2.Dr. Avinash Pathak
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Director
Adv. C. JAYANT K. RAO
-
3.Mission Director
Adv. C. JAYANT K. RAO
-
4.Chief Medical and Health Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
Case Summary: WPS/1485/2025 Two medical officers sought mandamus relief for unpaid CRMC scheme incentives from 2021 onwards. The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of the petition, directing the petitioners to submit a fresh comprehensive representation with supporting documents to the National Health Mission Director and Chief Medical Officer, who shall decide within three months in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
-
25-Feb-2025
For Orders [On Office Notes]
Additional Registrar(j)
-
20-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/1485/2025
Case Summary: WPS/1485/2025 Two medical officers sought mandamus relief for unpaid CRMC scheme incentives from 2021 onwards. The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of the petition, directing the petitioners to submit a fresh comprehensive representation with supporting documents to the National Health Mission Director and Chief Medical Officer, who shall decide within three months in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts