Kallu Mansuri vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2033/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010076412026

Filing Number

MCRC/3253/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2033/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kallu Mansuri

    Adv. Rajat Agrawal,DEVASHISH AGRAWAL,DEVASHISH AGRAWAL, ,Sanjay Pathak,ADITYA AGRAWAL,ADITYA AGRAWAL,DEVASHISH AGRAWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected regular bail applications of Kallu Mansuri and Poonamchandra Verma in a cyber fraud case (Crime No. 153/2025) involving alleged cheating and online forex trading fraud. The Court found prima facie involvement of both applicants in the transaction chain, as Rs. 50,000 from defrauded funds (totaling Rs. 46 lakhs) was transferred to the applicant's bank account, which was allegedly provided to co-accused persons for facilitating fraudulent transactions, despite their claims of innocence and lack of criminal antecedents. The Court directed the trial court to expeditiously conclude proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2033/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected regular bail applications of Kallu Mansuri and Poonamchandra Verma in a cyber fraud case (Crime No. 153/2025) involving alleged cheating and online forex trading fraud. The Court found prima facie involvement of both applicants in the transaction chain, as Rs. 50,000 from defrauded funds (totaling Rs. 46 lakhs) was transferred to the applicant's bank account, which was allegedly provided to co-accused persons for facilitating fraudulent transactions, despite their claims of innocence and lack of criminal antecedents. The Court directed the trial court to expeditiously conclude proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case