CHANDRASHEKHAR MIRI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2021/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010076112026

Filing Number

MCRC/3232/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2021/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDRASHEKHAR MIRI

    Adv. PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,ASHOK KUMAR TANDON,ASHOK KUMAR TANDON, ,PURNCHAND,SANTOSHI YADAV,ASHOK KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Chandrashekhar Miri, arrested for illegally transporting 45 liters of Mahua liquor under the Excise Act. The court held that since the charge-sheet was already filed, further custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and a previous criminal record alone cannot justify bail denial without evidence of absconding risk. The applicant was released on personal bond with two sureties, subject to strict conditions including mandatory court attendance and undertakings against adjournment requests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2021/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Chandrashekhar Miri, arrested for illegally transporting 45 liters of Mahua liquor under the Excise Act. The court held that since the charge-sheet was already filed, further custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and a previous criminal record alone cannot justify bail denial without evidence of absconding risk. The applicant was released on personal bond with two sureties, subject to strict conditions including mandatory court attendance and undertakings against adjournment requests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case