SMT. DHANESHWARI BARIK vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/2049/2026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010074802026
Filing Number
WPS/4278/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
WPS/2049/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
SELECTION, APPOINTMENT & RECRUITMENT INCLUDING EXAMINATION, INTERVIEW. ( 614 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. DHANESHWARI BARIK
Adv. PUSHPENDRA KUMAR PATEL,DEVENDRA KASHYAP,DEVENDRA KASHYAP, ,DHANESHWARI PATEL,DHANESHWARI PATEL,DHANESHWARI PATEL,DHANESHWARI PATEL,DHANESHWARI PATEL,DHANESHWARI PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Commissioner
-
3.The Collector
-
4.The Chief Executive Officer
-
5.The Authorized Officer cum Project Officer
-
6.The District Program Officer
-
7.Puja Kumar Das
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF
Case Summary: In WPS No. 2049/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur heard the petition of Smt. Dhaneshwari Barik against the State of Chhattisgarh on 07/05/2026. The petitioner's counsel requested an adjournment as the arguing counsel Mr. P.K. Patel was on adjustment. The court allowed the request and adjourned the case for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
-
26-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
-
26-Feb-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/2049/2026
Case Summary: In WPS No. 2049/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur heard the petition of Smt. Dhaneshwari Barik against the State of Chhattisgarh on 07/05/2026. The petitioner's counsel requested an adjournment as the arguing counsel Mr. P.K. Patel was on adjustment. The court allowed the request and adjourned the case for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts