JWALA VERMA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/1879/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010074572026

Filing Number

MCRC/3201/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRC/1879/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

NDPS Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JWALA VERMA

    Adv. ASHISH GUPTA,MINAKSHI GUPTA,MINAKSHI GUPTA, ,MANISH UPADHYAY,ABHINAV TIWARI,MINAKSHI GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Jwala Verma, arrested for possession of 4.994 kg cannabis under Section 20(B) of the NDPS Act, considering that the quantity was below commercial threshold, a co-accused received bail earlier, and prolonged trial duration. The court imposed conditions including personal bond with sureties, mandatory court attendance, non-adjournment undertaking, and strict compliance with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/1879/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Jwala Verma, arrested for possession of 4.994 kg cannabis under Section 20(B) of the NDPS Act, considering that the quantity was below commercial threshold, a co-accused received bail earlier, and prolonged trial duration. The court imposed conditions including personal bond with sureties, mandatory court attendance, non-adjournment undertaking, and strict compliance with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case