NITYANAND SAAND vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2040/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010074022026

Filing Number

MCRC/3166/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2040/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NITYANAND SAAND

    Adv. SURFARAJ KHAN,BAJRANG LAL AGRAWAL,BAJRANG LAL AGRAWAL, ,AYUSH LALL,KIRAN SAHU,RISHI SAHU,RISHI SAHU

  2. 2.Miniketan Nag

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Nityanand Saand and Miniketan Nag, arrested for possessing 69.120 liters of illicit liquor under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act. The court considered their clean criminal records, prolonged judicial custody since January 7, 2026, likelihood of lengthy trial proceedings, and fixed stringent conditions including personal bond with two sureties, mandatory court appearance, and prohibition on seeking adjournments during witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2040/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Nityanand Saand and Miniketan Nag, arrested for possessing 69.120 liters of illicit liquor under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act. The court considered their clean criminal records, prolonged judicial custody since January 7, 2026, likelihood of lengthy trial proceedings, and fixed stringent conditions including personal bond with two sureties, mandatory court appearance, and prohibition on seeking adjournments during witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case