KANHAIYA LAL BANJARE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2056/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010073952026

Filing Number

MCRC/3162/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2056/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KANHAIYA LAL BANJARE

    Adv. VIRENDRA KASHYAP,CHETNA RAIKWAR,CHETNA RAIKWAR, ,CHETNA RAIKWAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Kanhaiya Lal Banjare, arrested for illegal possession of 60 liters of handmade Mahua liquor under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act. The court found him entitled to bail considering he had been in custody since February 6, 2026, the charge-sheet was already filed, trial conclusion would take considerable time, and despite one prior excise violation. Bail was granted on conditions including a personal bond with two sureties and strict undertakings regarding court attendance and non-adjournment of witness examination dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2056/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Kanhaiya Lal Banjare, arrested for illegal possession of 60 liters of handmade Mahua liquor under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act. The court found him entitled to bail considering he had been in custody since February 6, 2026, the charge-sheet was already filed, trial conclusion would take considerable time, and despite one prior excise violation. Bail was granted on conditions including a personal bond with two sureties and strict undertakings regarding court attendance and non-adjournment of witness examination dates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case