TOSHKUMAR MAHESHWARI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/1986/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010073882026

Filing Number

MCRC/3159/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRC/1986/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TOSHKUMAR MAHESHWARI

    Adv. VIRENDRA KASHYAP,CHETNA RAIKWAR,CHETNA RAIKWAR, ,CHETNA RAIKWAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Toshkumar Maheshwari, arrested for possessing 50 liters of illegal Mahua liquor under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act. The court considered that the applicant had no criminal antecedents, the charge-sheet was already filed, and he had been in custody since February 6, 2026, with trial likely to take considerable time. Bail was granted on personal bond with two sureties and strict conditions including mandatory court attendance and no adjournment-seeking during witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/1986/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Toshkumar Maheshwari, arrested for possessing 50 liters of illegal Mahua liquor under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act. The court considered that the applicant had no criminal antecedents, the charge-sheet was already filed, and he had been in custody since February 6, 2026, with trial likely to take considerable time. Bail was granted on personal bond with two sureties and strict conditions including mandatory court attendance and no adjournment-seeking during witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case