SUKALDAI vs GANGA RAM Advocate - A.G., ,VIKASH A.SHRIVASTAVA,PRAGYA SHRIVASTAVA,Santosh Bharat,JAINENDRA KUMAR SHASTRI,JAINENDRA KUMAR SHASTRI,JAINENDRA KUMAR SHASTRI,MEENA SHASTRI — SA/207/2020

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010073662020

Filing Number

SA/4158/2020

Filing Date

26-Feb-2020

Registration No

SA/207/2020

Registration Date

05-Mar-2020

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL FOR DECLARATION AND POSSESSION ( 1717 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUKALDAI

    Adv. Narayan Prasad Thakur,ARTI CHANDRA DUTTA,ARTI CHANDRA DUTTA, T.K. JHA,Bhaskar Jha,Anamika Singh,Anamika Singh

  2. 2.Guruwari

  3. 3.Gundhar

  4. 4.Fulsingh

  5. 5.Damarudhar

  6. 6.Motilal

  7. 7.Khembati

  8. 8.Padmani

  9. 9.Jhanakdi

  10. 10.Surajbati

  11. 11.Dutika

  12. 12.Dumarbati

  13. 13.Banita

  14. 14.Chamarin

  15. 15.Devoram

  16. 16.Santari

  17. 17.Rambati

  18. 18.Sanmati

  19. 19.Kushal Ram

  20. 20.Sukmati

  21. 21.Shambhu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GANGA RAM Advocate - A.G., ,VIKASH A.SHRIVASTAVA,PRAGYA SHRIVASTAVA,Santosh Bharat,JAINENDRA KUMAR SHASTRI,JAINENDRA KUMAR SHASTRI,JAINENDRA KUMAR SHASTRI,MEENA SHASTRI

  2. 2.Puran Singh

  3. 3.Krishna Kumar

  4. 4.Bhanmati

  5. 5.Khem Kumar

  6. 6.Purauram

  7. 7.Leboram

  8. 8.Lakhanlal

  9. 9.Ratni

  10. 10.Durgeswari

  11. 11.Vinay Kumar

  12. 12.Dayavati

  13. 13.Bhavanbati

  14. 14.Rayabati

  15. 15.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Summary: This is a civil appeal (SA No. 207 of 2020) in the High Court of Chhattisgarh involving a dispute between Sukaldai and Ganga Ram regarding property partition. The most recent order (28/04/2026) directs the State counsel to obtain clarification from the Tehsildar within three weeks regarding the authenticity of a partition document (Namantaran Panji) and file an affidavit accordingly. The appeal is adjourned for hearing after three weeks, with interim relief continuing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

  5. 23-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  6. 15-Mar-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  7. 15-Mar-2022

    Orders on IAs

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  8. 31-Jan-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

  9. 12-Feb-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

  10. 27-Oct-2020

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

  11. 23-Sep-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

  12. 06-Mar-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

  13. 06-Mar-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 26-Feb-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/207/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a civil appeal (SA No. 207 of 2020) in the High Court of Chhattisgarh involving a dispute between Sukaldai and Ganga Ram regarding property partition. The most recent order (28/04/2026) directs the State counsel to obtain clarification from the Tehsildar within three weeks regarding the authenticity of a partition document (Namantaran Panji) and file an affidavit accordingly. The appeal is adjourned for hearing after three weeks, with interim relief continuing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case