SIMON KHES vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRR/410/2026

Disposed: Contested--NON PROSECUTION on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010073522026

Filing Number

CRR/3149/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRR/410/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 1440 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--NON PROSECUTION

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SIMON KHES

    Adv. VIKAS KUMAR PANDEY,TITRA RAM PATEL,TITRA RAM PATEL, ,ADARSH RAJPUT,TITRA RAM PATEL

  2. 2.Kuldeep Kerketta

  3. 3.Samal Tirkey

  4. 4.Amit Lakra

  5. 5.Praveen Lakra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed Criminal Revision No. 410 of 2026 filed by Simon Khes and four others against the State of Chhattisgarh for non-prosecution. Since the applicants failed to appear for hearing on two consecutive dates (24.03.2026 and 15.04.2026) and made no representation, the court found they were not interested in pursuing the revision and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/410/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed Criminal Revision No. 410 of 2026 filed by Simon Khes and four others against the State of Chhattisgarh for non-prosecution. Since the applicants failed to appear for hearing on two consecutive dates (24.03.2026 and 15.04.2026) and made no representation, the court found they were not interested in pursuing the revision and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case