TEJKUMAR DADSENA @ BHOLU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/1854/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010073272026

Filing Number

MCRC/3134/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRC/1854/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TEJKUMAR DADSENA @ BHOLU

    Adv. SUDHIR KUMAR SAHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Tejkumar Dadsena, arrested for illegal liquor possession under the Chhattisgarh Excise Act. Considering his clean criminal record, detention since February 7, 2026, and the likely prolonged trial duration, the court allowed bail on personal bond with two sureties, imposing conditions requiring his presence in court and prohibiting adjournment requests during evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/1854/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Tejkumar Dadsena, arrested for illegal liquor possession under the Chhattisgarh Excise Act. Considering his clean criminal record, detention since February 7, 2026, and the likely prolonged trial duration, the court allowed bail on personal bond with two sureties, imposing conditions requiring his presence in court and prohibiting adjournment requests during evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case