GANGA RAM SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WA/290/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISSMISS FOR DEFAULT/NON-PROSECUTION on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010073032026

Filing Number

WA/4170/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

WA/290/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISSMISS FOR DEFAULT/NON-PROSECUTION

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GANGA RAM SAHU

    Adv. PRABHAT KUMAR SAXENA,Bharat Gulabani,Bharat Gulabani, ,GALIB DWIVEDI,ANIL TAWADKAR,AMIYAKANT TIWARI,Bharat Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Additional Commissioner

  3. 3.Additional Collector

  4. 4.Chief Executive Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Ganga Ram Sahu's intra-court appeal (WA No. 290 of 2026) against the Single Judge's dismissal of his writ petition (WPS No. 1578 of 2019) for want of prosecution. The appellant failed to appear or provide representation when the case was called despite repeated calls, demonstrating loss of interest in pursuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/290/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Ganga Ram Sahu's intra-court appeal (WA No. 290 of 2026) against the Single Judge's dismissal of his writ petition (WPS No. 1578 of 2019) for want of prosecution. The appellant failed to appear or provide representation when the case was called despite repeated calls, demonstrating loss of interest in pursuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case