RADHEYSHYAM SAHU vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI — WPC/984/2026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010073002026
Filing Number
WPC/4167/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
WPC/984/2026
Registration Date
02-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO FOREST ACT, 1927 & C.G. KASTH CHIRAM (VINIYAM) ADHINIYAM, 1984. ( 1711 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RADHEYSHYAM SAHU
Adv. AVINASH CHAND SAHU,AMIT NAYAK,AMIT NAYAK, ,PRIYA SHARMA,AMAN TAMRAKAR,AMIT NAYAK
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI
-
2.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Adv. A.G.
-
3.Principal Chief Conservator of Forest
-
4.State level Committee Chhattisgarh
-
5.Divisional Forest Officer-cum-Licencing Authority
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
The case WPC/984/2026 (Radheyshyam Sahu v. Union of India & State of Chhattisgarh) was heard on 06/05/2026 at the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur along with 17 other related petitions. Arguments were presented by counsel for the petitioners and respondents (DSGI for UOI and Deputy AG for the State). The court reserved its orders for later pronouncement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Motion Hearing Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
25-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/984/2026
The case WPC/984/2026 (Radheyshyam Sahu v. Union of India & State of Chhattisgarh) was heard on 06/05/2026 at the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur along with 17 other related petitions. Arguments were presented by counsel for the petitioners and respondents (DSGI for UOI and Deputy AG for the State). The court reserved its orders for later pronouncement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts