KANTI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2058/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010072392026
Filing Number
MCRC/3101/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
MCRC/2058/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 26-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KANTI
Adv. ANIL KUMAR GULATI,ANIL KUMAR BHOI,ANIL KUMAR BHOI, ,GUNJA TARAM,GUNJA TARAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
Case Summary: MCRC/2058/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to applicant Kanti, a 50-year-old woman arrested for offences including forgery and cheating under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that Kanti had no criminal antecedents, was jailed since January 28, 2026, and the chargesheet remained unfiled, with trial likely prolonged. She was released on personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including mandatory court attendance, non-adjournment undertakings, and personal presence at case opening and charge framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
02-Mar-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
02-Mar-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/2058/2026
Case Summary: MCRC/2058/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to applicant Kanti, a 50-year-old woman arrested for offences including forgery and cheating under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that Kanti had no criminal antecedents, was jailed since January 28, 2026, and the chargesheet remained unfiled, with trial likely prolonged. She was released on personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including mandatory court attendance, non-adjournment undertakings, and personal presence at case opening and charge framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts