MANJALA MALIYA @ MANJ LAL vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2069/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010071362026

Filing Number

MCRC/3055/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2069/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

NDPS Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANJALA MALIYA @ MANJ LAL

    Adv. Roop Ram Naik,RAMESHWAR PRASAD PATEL,RAMESHWAR PRASAD PATEL, ,MANJU NAIK,ABHISHEK SHARMA,SANGEETA KAUSHIK,DEVENDRA KUMAR BHARDWAJ,DEVENDRA KUMAR BHARDWAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/2069/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Manjala Maliya, arrested for possessing 6.58 kg of ganja under NDPS Act Section 20(B), because the quantity was below the commercial threshold (20 kg) and the charge-sheet had been filed. The court considered that prolonged incarceration pending trial was unjustified given his lack of criminal antecedents. Bail was conditional on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance terms including mandatory court attendance and undertakings against seeking adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2069/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/2069/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Manjala Maliya, arrested for possessing 6.58 kg of ganja under NDPS Act Section 20(B), because the quantity was below the commercial threshold (20 kg) and the charge-sheet had been filed. The court considered that prolonged incarceration pending trial was unjustified given his lack of criminal antecedents. Bail was conditional on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance terms including mandatory court attendance and undertakings against seeking adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case