MAA ANNPURNA MAHILA SWA SAHAYATA SAMUH vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/1330/2026

Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010069722026

Filing Number

WPC/3983/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

WPC/1330/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAA ANNPURNA MAHILA SWA SAHAYATA SAMUH

    Adv. VIKAS KUMAR PANDEY,TITRA RAM PATEL,TITRA RAM PATEL, ,ADARSH RAJPUT,TITRA RAM PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.COMMISIIONER

  3. 3.COLLECTOR

  4. 4.DISTRICT PROGRAM OFFICER

  5. 5.CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  6. 6.SAPORAMATA MAHILA SWA SAHAYATA SAMUH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by Maa Annpurna Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh as withdrawn, allowing the petitioner's counsel to file a fresh and better constituted petition. The State counsel consented to the withdrawal, and all pending interlocutory applications were disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/1330/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by Maa Annpurna Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh as withdrawn, allowing the petitioner's counsel to file a fresh and better constituted petition. The State counsel consented to the withdrawal, and all pending interlocutory applications were disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case