ISHWAR CHOUHAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/1948/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010068712026

Filing Number

MCRC/2940/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRC/1948/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ISHWAR CHOUHAN

    Adv. RAHUL GOSWAMI,DHARMENDRA BAGHEL,DHARMENDRA BAGHEL, DHARMENDRA BAGHEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed Ishwar Chouhan's bail application in four related cases involving employment fraud charges, granting bail on the principle of parity since all identically situated co-accused persons had already been granted bail by the court. The applicant must furnish personal bonds with sureties and comply with conditions including mandatory court appearances, refraining from seeking adjournments during evidence, and remaining present during critical trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/1948/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed Ishwar Chouhan's bail application in four related cases involving employment fraud charges, granting bail on the principle of parity since all identically situated co-accused persons had already been granted bail by the court. The applicant must furnish personal bonds with sureties and comply with conditions including mandatory court appearances, refraining from seeking adjournments during evidence, and remaining present during critical trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case