NANDO JANI vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/1917/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010068042026

Filing Number

MCRC/2916/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRC/1917/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

NDPS Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NANDO JANI

    Adv. SATISH GUPTA,SAKSHAM SONI,SAKSHAM SONI, ,CHETNA SHARMA,CHETNA SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Nando Jani, arrested for NDPS Act violations (23 kg ganja seizure), citing that a co-accused received bail, the applicant has no criminal antecedents, prolonged custody since August 2022, and trial completion will take considerable time. Bail was granted with conditions including personal bond, two local sureties, mandatory court attendance, and no adjournment-seeking during witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/1917/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Nando Jani, arrested for NDPS Act violations (23 kg ganja seizure), citing that a co-accused received bail, the applicant has no criminal antecedents, prolonged custody since August 2022, and trial completion will take considerable time. Bail was granted with conditions including personal bond, two local sureties, mandatory court attendance, and no adjournment-seeking during witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case