RAJIYA KHATUN vs KUTUBUDDIN ANSARI — MAC/474/2020

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010067922020

Filing Number

MAC/3809/2020

Filing Date

20-Feb-2020

Registration No

MAC/474/2020

Registration Date

27-Feb-2020

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS. ( 1210 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 15-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJIYA KHATUN

    Adv. A.N.PANDEY

  2. 2.Sona bibi

  3. 3.Taiyab Ansari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KUTUBUDDIN ANSARI

  2. 2.Jahid Khan

    Adv. SYED MOHAMMAD SOHAIL AFZAL,SYED MOHAMMAD SARTAJ AFZAL HARSH VERMA

  3. 3.The Branch Manager

    Adv. SANGEET KUMAR KUSHWAHA,Sharad Mishra PRIYA KAIWART

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court set aside the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's dismissal order and held that the Tribunal at Korba has jurisdiction to hear the compensation claim under Section 166(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, since the vehicle owner (defendant) resides in Korba district. The court remitted the matter to the Korba Tribunal for decision within four months, noting the accident occurred over 11 years ago in 2015. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  4. 22-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  5. 05-Jan-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  6. 03-Mar-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  7. 03-Mar-2020

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal

  8. 20-Feb-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAC/474/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court set aside the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's dismissal order and held that the Tribunal at Korba has jurisdiction to hear the compensation claim under Section 166(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, since the vehicle owner (defendant) resides in Korba district. The court remitted the matter to the Korba Tribunal for decision within four months, noting the accident occurred over 11 years ago in 2015. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case