RAMAYAN YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/1880/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010067842026

Filing Number

MCRC/2901/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRC/1880/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMAYAN YADAV

    Adv. PRAVEEN DHURANDHAR,HARENDRA UMARE,HARENDRA UMARE, ,N.S.DHURANDHAR,Ranjana Tiwari,Ranjana Tiwari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Ramayan Yadav, arrested for illegal liquor trafficking under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, after he had spent over three months in custody since January 11, 2026. The court found that bail was warranted considering the case's nature, prolonged detention, and expected trial duration, despite the applicant's ten prior criminal antecedents. Bail was conditional on a personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance requirements including mandatory court attendance, no adjournment-seeking during evidence, and personal presence at case opening, charge framing, and statement recording stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/1880/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Ramayan Yadav, arrested for illegal liquor trafficking under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, after he had spent over three months in custody since January 11, 2026. The court found that bail was warranted considering the case's nature, prolonged detention, and expected trial duration, despite the applicant's ten prior criminal antecedents. Bail was conditional on a personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance requirements including mandatory court attendance, no adjournment-seeking during evidence, and personal presence at case opening, charge framing, and statement recording stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case