CHAIN SINGH @ CHAINU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2704/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010067172026
Filing Number
MCRC/2872/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
MCRC/2704/2026
Registration Date
19-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHAIN SINGH @ CHAINU
Adv. Bhavika Kotecha,PARAG KOTECHA,PARAG KOTECHA, ,PARAG KOTECHA
-
2.Ghanshyam Singh @ Nanbabua
-
3.Rammilan Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to three applicants (Chain Singh, Ghanshyam Singh, and Rammilan Singh) accused of causing death by laying an electrified G.I. wire in a forest to hunt wild pigs, which resulted in an unintended death. The court considered that the charge-sheet had been filed, the applicants had no criminal antecedents, they had been in detention since December 27, 2025, and the trial would take considerable time, warranting release on bail with strict conditions including personal bonds, mandatory court attendance, and restrictions on seeking adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/2704/2026
Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to three applicants (Chain Singh, Ghanshyam Singh, and Rammilan Singh) accused of causing death by laying an electrified G.I. wire in a forest to hunt wild pigs, which resulted in an unintended death. The court considered that the charge-sheet had been filed, the applicants had no criminal antecedents, they had been in detention since December 27, 2025, and the trial would take considerable time, warranting release on bail with strict conditions including personal bonds, mandatory court attendance, and restrictions on seeking adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts