DHEERAJ SHARMA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2054/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010066802026
Filing Number
MCRC/2859/2026
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
MCRC/2054/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 26-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHEERAJ SHARMA
Adv. JAYA GUPTA,ANKUR SETH,ANKUR SETH, ,ANKUSH SONI,ANKUR SETH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: MCRC/2054/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Dheeraj Sharma in his second bail application for theft charges involving gold and cash stolen from a house where he had access. The court found him entitled to bail based on: (1) the trial's slow progress—only one of 21 prosecution witnesses examined despite nine months of detention since August 2025; (2) his clean criminal record; and (3) the earlier rejection being conditional on expeditious trial completion. The applicant was released on personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including mandatory court attendance, no adjournment requests when witnesses are present, and personal presence at key trial stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
02-Mar-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
02-Mar-2026
For Orders [On Office Notes]
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/2054/2026
CASE SUMMARY: MCRC/2054/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Dheeraj Sharma in his second bail application for theft charges involving gold and cash stolen from a house where he had access. The court found him entitled to bail based on: (1) the trial's slow progress—only one of 21 prosecution witnesses examined despite nine months of detention since August 2025; (2) his clean criminal record; and (3) the earlier rejection being conditional on expeditious trial completion. The applicant was released on personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including mandatory court attendance, no adjournment requests when witnesses are present, and personal presence at key trial stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts