ALEKH RAM SIDAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WA/253/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010065042026

Filing Number

WA/3720/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

WA/253/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

PAY SCALES/ INCREMENTS / ALLOWANCES. ( 610 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ALEKH RAM SIDAR

    Adv. DEVASHISH TIWARI,Shiv SewaK Manjhi,Shiv SewaK Manjhi, ,DINESH YADAV,Deepak Kaushik,Shiv SewaK Manjhi

  2. 2.BHOGNATH NAIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

  3. 3.DIRECTOR

  4. 4.COMMISSIONER-CUM DIRECTOR

  5. 5.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER

  6. 6.CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  7. 7.CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  8. 8.BLOCK EDUCTION OFFICER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the appeal of two lecturer-appellants seeking Kramonnati Vetanman (pay increment benefits) under a 2017 circular, holding that this benefit applies only to regular Government employees and not to Shiksha Karmi (teachers) who were employed under the Panchayat Department until their absorption in 2018. The court found the case identical to a previously decided appeal and upheld the lower court's reasoning that Panchayat-cadre employees' service conditions are governed by separate Panchayat rules, not Government employment circulars. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/253/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the appeal of two lecturer-appellants seeking Kramonnati Vetanman (pay increment benefits) under a 2017 circular, holding that this benefit applies only to regular Government employees and not to Shiksha Karmi (teachers) who were employed under the Panchayat Department until their absorption in 2018. The court found the case identical to a previously decided appeal and upheld the lower court's reasoning that Panchayat-cadre employees' service conditions are governed by separate Panchayat rules, not Government employment circulars. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case