PRAMOD SHARMA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRA/474/2026

Status: Fresh Matters. Next hearing: : -.

Fresh Matters Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010063952026

Filing Number

CRA/2741/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRA/474/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS RELATING TO DRUGS & COSMETICS, NDPS ACT. ( 1416 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAMOD SHARMA

    Adv. VIKASH PRADHAN,ANJALI PRADHAN,ANJALI PRADHAN, ANJALI PRADHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted three consolidated criminal appeals (CRA No. 14, 285, and 474 of 2026) by Vikash Mina against the State of Chhattisgarh. The court condoned the delay in filing CRA No. 474/2026 as the accused's statutory right to appeal was recognized with satisfactory cause shown. The State has been directed to file its objections regarding suspension of sentence and bail within two weeks, along with information on the appellants' criminal antecedents, with the matter listed for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA/474/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted three consolidated criminal appeals (CRA No. 14, 285, and 474 of 2026) by Vikash Mina against the State of Chhattisgarh. The court condoned the delay in filing CRA No. 474/2026 as the accused's statutory right to appeal was recognized with satisfactory cause shown. The State has been directed to file its objections regarding suspension of sentence and bail within two weeks, along with information on the appellants' criminal antecedents, with the matter listed for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case