VIJAY PRAKASH GUPTA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/2431/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010062402026

Filing Number

WPS/3577/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

WPS/2431/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

REGULARIZATION OF AD-HOC EMPLOYEES ETC. ( 602 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAY PRAKASH GUPTA

    Adv. ABHYUDAY TRIPATHI,MATEEN SIDDIQUI,MATEEN SIDDIQUI, ,RUPESH SAHU,APOORVA PANDEY,APOORVA PANDEY,APOORVA PANDEY,ZAINAB MUSTAFA VANAK,DANISH AHMAD SIDDIQUI,waquar naiyer,NARENDRA MEHAR,SANDEEP SINGH,MATEEN SIDDIQUI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Director

  3. 3.Principal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of a writ petition by Vijay Prakash Gupta, a contractual lecturer since 2010, directing him to submit a fresh comprehensive representation for regularization to the Director of Technical Education. The court held that the State must consider his regularization claim within 4 months, citing Supreme Court precedents condemning prolonged contractual engagement and emphasizing that fairness in public employment is a constitutional obligation under Articles 14, 16, and 21. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/2431/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of a writ petition by Vijay Prakash Gupta, a contractual lecturer since 2010, directing him to submit a fresh comprehensive representation for regularization to the Director of Technical Education. The court held that the State must consider his regularization claim within 4 months, citing Supreme Court precedents condemning prolonged contractual engagement and emphasizing that fairness in public employment is a constitutional obligation under Articles 14, 16, and 21. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case