SADHRAM YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/1293/2022

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010060102022

Filing Number

WPS/3358/2022

Filing Date

15-Feb-2022

Registration No

WPS/1293/2022

Registration Date

22-Feb-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

PAY SCALES/ INCREMENTS / ALLOWANCES. ( 610 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SADHRAM YADAV

    Adv. AJEET KUMAR YADAV

  2. 2.Masartam Ratre

  3. 3.Smt. Filmini Tirkey

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Secretary,

  3. 3.The Assistant Commissioner,

  4. 4.The Joint Director,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition filed by three government employees (working as peons) seeking relief regarding pay-scale benefits. The court found the petition infructuous as the State had already granted the petitioners their first-time bound pay-scale, thereby resolving their grievance. With no further issues to adjudicate, the petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2022

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy

  4. 23-Mar-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam KoshyView PDF

  5. 25-Feb-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

  6. 25-Feb-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 15-Feb-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/1293/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the writ petition filed by three government employees (working as peons) seeking relief regarding pay-scale benefits. The court found the petition infructuous as the State had already granted the petitioners their first-time bound pay-scale, thereby resolving their grievance. With no further issues to adjudicate, the petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case