M/s CG Engineering Co. vs Union of India Advocate - DSGI, ,RAMAKANT MISHRA — ARBR/7/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010058082026

e-Filing Number

05-02-2026

Filing Number

ARBR/3341/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

ARBR/7/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ARBITRATION MATTERS ( 11 )

Sub-Category

PETITIONS FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR UNDER THE SCHEME FRAMED BY ( 1101 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s CG Engineering Co.

    Adv. Harpreet Singh Ahluwalia,SHRIYA GUPTA,SHRIYA GUPTA, ,MAMTA GENDLE,GURMIT SINGH AHLUWALIA,GURMIT SINGH AHLUWALIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Union of India Advocate - DSGI, ,RAMAKANT MISHRA

  2. 2.Sr. Divisional Electrical Engineer (R S and G)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed the petition to terminate and substitute the sole arbitrator in a railway contract dispute. The court found that while the arbitrator's conduct raised concerns about impartiality—including allowing respondent witnesses to cross-examine themselves, asking extensive questions after closing arguments, and directing witness re-examination in the applicant's absence—both parties consented to appointing retired Justice Arvind Kumar Verma as the new arbitrator, making the petition allowable on mutual agreement rather than established bias. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ARBR/7/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed the petition to terminate and substitute the sole arbitrator in a railway contract dispute. The court found that while the arbitrator's conduct raised concerns about impartiality—including allowing respondent witnesses to cross-examine themselves, asking extensive questions after closing arguments, and directing witness re-examination in the applicant's absence—both parties consented to appointing retired Justice Arvind Kumar Verma as the new arbitrator, making the petition allowable on mutual agreement rather than established bias. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case