AGRAWAL SAW MILL vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI — WPC/768/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010057982026

Filing Number

WPC/3334/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

WPC/768/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO FOREST ACT, 1927 & C.G. KASTH CHIRAM (VINIYAM) ADHINIYAM, 1984. ( 1711 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AGRAWAL SAW MILL

    Adv. ADITYA BHARDWAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DSGI

  2. 2.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

    Adv. A.G.

  3. 3.Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest

  4. 4.State Level Committee

  5. 5.Divisional Forest Officer-Cum-Licensing Authority

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    The case WPC/768/2026 (AGRAWAL SAW MILL v. UNION OF INDIA) was heard on 06/05/2026 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur as part of consolidated proceedings with multiple petitions. Arguments were presented by counsel for the petitioners and respondents (DSGI and State). The court reserved its order for later pronouncement; no final order has been issued yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 25-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/768/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The case WPC/768/2026 (AGRAWAL SAW MILL v. UNION OF INDIA) was heard on 06/05/2026 before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur as part of consolidated proceedings with multiple petitions. Arguments were presented by counsel for the petitioners and respondents (DSGI and State). The court reserved its order for later pronouncement; no final order has been issued yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case