LAKKI YADAV @ LAKKU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/1623/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010057782026

Filing Number

MCRC/2464/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRC/1623/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAKKI YADAV @ LAKKU

    Adv. Ritesh Verma,SOMNATH VERMA,SOMNATH VERMA, ,SOMNATH VERMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Lakki Yadav, arrested for illegally brandishing a knife under Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. The court held that while the applicant has nine criminal antecedents, criminal history alone cannot deny bail, especially when the chargesheet is filed and trial will take considerable time; bail's purpose is ensuring trial presence, not pre-conviction punishment. The applicant was released on personal bond with two sureties and strict conditions including mandatory court attendance and no adjournment seeking during witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/1623/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Lakki Yadav, arrested for illegally brandishing a knife under Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. The court held that while the applicant has nine criminal antecedents, criminal history alone cannot deny bail, especially when the chargesheet is filed and trial will take considerable time; bail's purpose is ensuring trial presence, not pre-conviction punishment. The applicant was released on personal bond with two sureties and strict conditions including mandatory court attendance and no adjournment seeking during witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case