GULAB SINGH vs DR. SARANSH MITTAR Advocate - MATEEN SIDDIQUI, ,SANDEEP SINGH,NARENDRA MEHAR,RAHUL SHARMA,DIKSHA GOURAHA,NELSON PANNA,HARSHMANDER RASTOGI,ANADI SHARMA,MONIKA THAKUR — CONT/250/2022
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010056212022
Filing Number
CONT/3087/2022
Filing Date
14-Feb-2022
Registration No
CONT/250/2022
Registration Date
15-Feb-2022
Judge
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey
Coram
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT OF COURT MATTERS ( 16 )
Sub-Category
OTHER CIVIL CONTEMPT MATTERS ( 1603 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 17-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GULAB SINGH
Adv. MADHURIMA THAKUR,Palak Jindal,Palak Jindal, ,Hariom Rai,Palak Jindal
Respondent(s)
-
1.DR. SARANSH MITTAR Advocate - MATEEN SIDDIQUI, ,SANDEEP SINGH,NARENDRA MEHAR,RAHUL SHARMA,DIKSHA GOURAHA,NELSON PANNA,HARSHMANDER RASTOGI,ANADI SHARMA,MONIKA THAKUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani DubeyView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the contempt petition filed by Gulab Singh against Dr. Saransh Mittar (Collector Bilaspur) because the respondent reported full compliance with the earlier court order dated 13.07.2021, and the petitioner failed to appear to press the petition. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jan-2024
Motion Hearing Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
-
06-Dec-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF
-
17-Feb-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam BhaduriView PDF
-
17-Feb-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Feb-2022
Case filed
Registration No. CONT/250/2022
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the contempt petition filed by Gulab Singh against Dr. Saransh Mittar (Collector Bilaspur) because the respondent reported full compliance with the earlier court order dated 13.07.2021, and the petitioner failed to appear to press the petition. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts