FIRAT RAM YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — ACQA/31/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010055692026

Filing Number

ACQA/2355/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

ACQA/31/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 1440 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FIRAT RAM YADAV

    Adv. PUSHPENDRA KUMAR PATEL,SMT. DHANESHWARI PATEL,SMT. DHANESHWARI PATEL, ,DHANESHWARI PATEL,DHANESHWARI PATEL,DHANESHWARI PATEL,DHANESHWARI PATEL,DHANESHWARI PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Shyamu Yadav

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar VyasView PDF

    Case Summary: ACQA No. 31 of 2026 On 16/06/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted Firat Ram Yadav's appeal for hearing. After considering statements from the complainant Gendram Yadav and injured party Firat Ram, along with the Medical Legal Certificate report, the court found the appeal arguable. Notice was issued to Respondent No. 2 (Shyamu Yadav) with payment of process fee as per rules. The matter was adjourned for five weeks for further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

  4. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ACQA/31/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ACQA No. 31 of 2026 On 16/06/2026, the High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted Firat Ram Yadav's appeal for hearing. After considering statements from the complainant Gendram Yadav and injured party Firat Ram, along with the Medical Legal Certificate report, the court found the appeal arguable. Notice was issued to Respondent No. 2 (Shyamu Yadav) with payment of process fee as per rules. The matter was adjourned for five weeks for further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case