SITARAM CHALKI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/1489/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010054622026
Filing Number
MCRC/2305/2026
Filing Date
04-Feb-2026
Registration No
MCRC/1489/2026
Registration Date
07-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SITARAM CHALKI
Adv. PRAVIN KUMAR TULSYAN,ASHOK JAIN,ASHOK JAIN, ,KARAN KUMAR BAHARANI,VIKAS PATEL,Abhishek Nirala,Abhishek Nirala
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Sitaram Chalki, accused of voluntarily causing hurt under Section 109(1) of BNS for attacking someone with a knife in an agricultural dispute. The court considered that six prosecution witnesses out of 16 had been examined, the applicant had been in custody since October 31, 2025, and trial conclusion would take considerable time, making him eligible for bail with strict conditions including mandatory court attendance and non-adjournment undertakings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
26-Feb-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
04-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/1489/2026
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Sitaram Chalki, accused of voluntarily causing hurt under Section 109(1) of BNS for attacking someone with a knife in an agricultural dispute. The court considered that six prosecution witnesses out of 16 had been examined, the applicant had been in custody since October 31, 2025, and trial conclusion would take considerable time, making him eligible for bail with strict conditions including mandatory court attendance and non-adjournment undertakings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts