PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER vs M/S RAIPUR DEVELOPMET AUTHORITY — TAXC/19/2026

Status: Motion Hearing Matters. Next hearing: : -.

Motion Hearing Matters Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010052912026

Filing Number

TAXC/3029/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

TAXC/19/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

INDIRECT TAXES MATTERS ( 4 )

Sub-Category

INTERPRETATION OF EXEMPTION NOTIFICATION UNDER THE CENTRAL EXCISE ACT. ( 420 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER

    Adv. MANEESH SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S RAIPUR DEVELOPMET AUTHORITY

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

    Case Summary - TAXC No. 19 of 2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the tax case between Principal Commissioner and M/S Raipur Development Authority for six weeks. The appellant's counsel was granted three weeks to file an additional application raising a Substantial Question of Law before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TAXC/19/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - TAXC No. 19 of 2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the tax case between Principal Commissioner and M/S Raipur Development Authority for six weeks. The appellant's counsel was granted three weeks to file an additional application raising a Substantial Question of Law before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case