Hema Meravi (Before Marriage Kumari Hemkumari Netam) vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/958/2022

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010052422022

Filing Number

WPS/2860/2022

Filing Date

09-Feb-2022

Registration No

WPS/958/2022

Registration Date

10-Feb-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

SENIORITY. ( 609 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hema Meravi (Before Marriage Kumari Hemkumari Netam)

    Adv. AJAY SHRIVASTAVA,VINOD KUMAR SHARMA,VINOD KUMAR SHARMA, ,SATYA KUMAR MANDLOI,G.P.MATHUR,VINOD KUMAR SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Director

  3. 3.Divisional Joint Director

  4. 4.District Education Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed WPS No. 958 of 2022 as infructuous, upon the petitioner's counsel stating that the matter had become moot due to passage of time. The dismissal was unopposed by the respondents (State of Chhattisgarh and education officials), indicating the underlying dispute or relief sought was no longer relevant or viable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Feb-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

  4. 14-Feb-2022

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

  5. 09-Feb-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/958/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed WPS No. 958 of 2022 as infructuous, upon the petitioner's counsel stating that the matter had become moot due to passage of time. The dismissal was unopposed by the respondents (State of Chhattisgarh and education officials), indicating the underlying dispute or relief sought was no longer relevant or viable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case